<img height="1" width="1" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=632771302280516&amp;ev=PageView%20&amp;noscript=1">


The Importance of Federal Intellectual Property Due Diligence in Mergers and Acquisitions

By: Pushkala Sivaramakrishnan, COGENCY GLOBAL, on Jan 13, 2023 5:18:20 AM

IP Due Diligence Brain with Asset Types_Header Image-1-1

What this is: The rise in importance of intellectual property due diligence when conducting mergers or acquisitions in the US.

What this means: Intellectual property is now one of the most important asset classes for many business entities. This article will show you how to conduct IP due diligence, explaining what it can determine for your merger or acquisition.

Are you involved in merger and acquisition transactions in the United States? Have you noticed an increase in the amount and importance of intellectual property owned by merging entities? 

For years, law firms have been conducting public record due diligence for merger transactions in the US by searching for UCC financing statements, federal tax liens, state tax liens, judgment liens, litigation and bankruptcy.

But today’s transactions require more. Many professionals have come to recognise that IP is likely the most valuable business asset that a company may possess. This is why it's crucial to incorporate federal intellectual property (IP) due diligence on your checklist, in addition to the standard lien, litigation and bankruptcy due diligence package.

Searching for IP at the Federal Level in the US

Based on the definition in Section 9-102(a)(42) of the Uniform Commercial Code, IP is considered a “general intangible”. While patents and trademarks may be pledged as collateral and are thus filed in UCC records around the US, relying on the state-level UCC central indices is not enough for IP due diligence purposes. Further, Article 9 of the UCC permits a general collateral description making it unclear if IP is within the scope of the collateral being secured or not since specifically identifying the IP properties in the collateral description is not required.


The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides a federal process to initiate and manage patents and trademarks, and grant security interests in those properties. It is necessary to search the USPTO for patent and trademark records, in addition to UCC central indexes, as without these additional USPTO searches, you may miss critical information affecting your transaction.


Keep in mind that IP due diligence searches are not limited to USPTO records. Searches for copyrights should also be conducted at the US Copyright Office (USCO) and Library of Congress. Perfection of security interest for registered US copyrights is accomplished by filing with the USCO, therefore a search of the copyright office should not be overlooked.


apple-touch-icon-120x120Need a registered agent? Visit our Corporate Services - Registered Agent page to learn how you can appoint one fast. 



What Does IP Due Diligence Determine?

Uncovering and/or confirming basic IP information is every bit as important as conducting the traditional UCC, lien, litigation and bankruptcy searches that have long been standard due diligence practice. IP searches should seek to answer the following questions:

  • Determine and/or confirm intellectual property ownership. Is the chain of title (history of ownership) in order?
  • Has the IP been maintained?
  • Have renewal filings been made or are they coming due?
  • Have any liens been granted on the IP assets?
  • Are intellectual property assignments necessary?

Like traditional UCC searches, establishing the federal IP chain of title and checking if any liens are filed against IP allows parties to execute closing responsibilities without last-minute, unexpected disasters. Or worse yet, trying to make changes to IP public records after the deal closes.

Intellectual property is often taking centre stage as one of the most important asset classes for many business entities. With this shift, federal intellectual property searches in the US should be considered a standard practice of thorough public record due diligence.

Still curious about IP due diligence? Check out this piece from Holland and Knight.


This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered, or relied upon, as legal advice.






Topics: Intellectual Property Due Diligence