<img height="1" width="1" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=632771302280516&amp;ev=PageView%20&amp;noscript=1">

CORPORATE TRANSACTIONS & COMPLIANCE BLOG

Ontario Personal Property Security Act Changes Where to File and Search

By: Teri Mayor, COGENCY GLOBAL on Thu, Jan 21, 2016

Secured transactions throughout Canada, except in Quebec, are governed by various versions of the Personal Property Canada PPSASecurity Act (PPSA), which is similar in many ways to the U.S. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Just as each state has its own UCC laws that may have some unique requirements and variations, each Canadian province (except Quebec) has its own version of the PPSA.

Ontario recently made some significant changes which mean Personal Property Security Registrations (the equivalent of U.S. UCC filing) may now get registered in a different location, depending on the collateral being secured. The changes actually stem from provisions of the Modernization Act of 2006 but had not been previously proclaimed in force because Ontario was hoping the other provinces would amend their statutes similarly. Unfortunately, this has not happened, which means there will need to be double filings made in some cases, where the rules of two different provinces conflict. We will discuss this situation further below.

 

Old and New Rules Should Be Considered Until End of Transition Period
When conducting searches in Canada, both the old rules and the new rules should be considered until 12/31/2020, which marks the end of the transition period. For entities registered under provincial laws (such as Ontario corporations or limited partnerships) or under U.S. State laws, the following rules apply:

Collateral

Where a Registration is made After 12/31/2015 (New)

Where a Registration was made Before 12/31/2015 (Old)

Intangible Property

Jurisdiction of Formation

Location of Head Office of Company

Mobile Good (such as transport vehicles)

Jurisdiction of Formation

Location of Head Office of Company

Instruments (checks, leases) where Secured Party does not have physical possession

Jurisdiction of Formation

Location of Head Office of Company

Tangible Goods

Location of the Property

Location of the Property

 

Example:

  1. Company was formed in Nova Scotia, but has a head office in Ontario. Under the old Ontario law, a registration against a mobile good would be made in Ontario. Under the new Ontario law, it would be made in Nova Scotia. However, to comply with Nova Scotia law, which states the registration should be made where the head office is located, an additional registration should be made in Ontario.
  1. Company was formed in Delaware and has a head office location in Toronto, Ontario.  Under the old Ontario law, a registration against intangible property would be made in Ontario and to comply with Article 9 of the U.S. UCC, a filing in Delaware would likely be made. Under the new Ontario law only a filing in Delaware would be needed. 

 

Under the new act, the proper location of registration is also dependent on the entity type:

  • Individuals: Principal residence
  • General Partnerships: Province of the stated governing law of the partnership, if any
  • Corporation, Limited Partnership or Organization formed under provincial, territorial or U.S. State law: Jurisdiction of Formation
  • Corporation formed under Federal Law: Location of Registered or Head Office
  • If none of the above apply: Jurisdiction of Chief Executive Office

 

Transition Rules:

  1. A security interest perfected under the old rules will continue to be perfected until 12/31/2020.
  2. A security interest perfected under the old rules will be deemed continuously perfected if it is registered under the new rules before 12/31/2020.

As mentioned above, these new registration requirements only affect Ontario. All other provinces, except Quebec, still require PPSAs to be filed in the location of the head office of the company for intangible property and the location of the property for tangible goods. As indicated above, in situations where the laws of two provinces conflict (for example a company formed in Ontario that has its head office in British Columbia), the recommendation is to file in both jurisdictions.  

These changes mean that Ontario’s secured transaction registration laws bear even more similarity to the U.S. UCC statutes. However, it is important to be aware of the key differences in the Canadian statutes. For example, when the collateral is tangible property, registrations are made at the personal property register in the province where the property is located. In the U.S., these filings would be made in the state of formation. When you are involved in conducting due diligence or registering a security interest for a Canadian company or individual, a service provider with a good understanding of how and where registrations are made can provide useful information to help you determine where to search and register.

 

This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered, or relied upon, as legal advice.

Topics: Personal Property Security Act (PPSA)